The Economic Crisis
The Effect of Distribution on the Crisis
Published on April 15, 2010VIDEOTalk at The New School for Social Research hosted by the Department of Economics
History for the Future on WRCT-Pittsburgh 88.3 fm
Published on April 14, 2010AUDIOProfessor Wolff speaks with Kevin Brown on his History for the Future radio show about the origins of the current economic crisis, especially changes in the system since the 1970s, and how we can do better than capitalism.
Interview with The Mantle
Published on April 13, 2010AUDIOJK Fowler of The Mantle, interviews Professor Wolff.
The key topics include the concepts of "class" and "overdetermination" as they figure in the new kind of Marxian analysis that Wolff applies to the current crisis in capitalism and to answering the question of what can and should be done in response to such crises.Capitalist Crisis and the Return to Marx
Marxian analyses are now resurfacing in public dialogues about economy and society. A generation of marginalization is fading as a new generation discovers the diverse richness of the Marxian tradition’s insights. Just as an economic crisisin 1848 helped to provoke and shape Marx’s original insights, today’s crisis helps to renew interest in Marxism.In the century before the 1970s, the victims of capitalism’s recurring crises and its critics increasingly turned toward Marx’s and other Marxists’ works.
Capitalism and the Useful Nation State
The nation state is once again proving its special usefulness as a vehicle for managing capitalist crisis. Partly, this follows from the renewal of Keynesian monetary and fiscal policies. Other key dimensions of state usefulness include its more direct provision of financial guarantees to private enterprises and its over-priced purchase of "toxic" assets (those that have suffered drastic losses) from their private owners.The Economic Crisis: A Marxian Interpretation
Like most capitalist crises, today’s challenges economists, journalists, and politicians to explain and to overcome it. The post-1930s struggles between neoclassical and Keynesian economics are rejoined. We show that both proved inadequate to preventing crises and served rather to enable and justify (as ‘‘solutions’’ for crises) what were merely oscillations between two forms of capitalism differentiated according to greater or lesser state economic interventions. Our Marxian economic analysis here proceeds differently.Capitalism Hits the Fan Screening at the New School
Published on March 3, 2010VIDEOOn March 3rd, 2010, the Graduate Program for International Affairs at the New School hosted a screening of Capitalism Hits the Fan. Here you can watch as Professor Wolff answers some questions from the audience after a screening of his film.
Lessons from the Housing Disaster
Of the roughly 56 million homes in the US today with mortgages, one in seven is "delinquent." That is over 7 million homes more than 30 days behind in mortgage payments. Those homeowners face foreclosure procedures likely leading to evictions. Very high (and still rising) unemployment levels guarantee rising mortgage delinquencies. Mass media and political statements about government and banks helping people avoid foreclosures ("mortgage modification") are often misleading. Relatively few have been helped and the help has been too little.Chronology of Capitalism
Published on February 9, 2010AUDIOFrom the National Radio Project: "It’s a time of economic transition, and systems that may have seemed stable over the past few decades are proving to be far from it. But how did we get here? And how can we learn from the past, to build a more fair and just system in the future? While many politicians and pundits claim that no one saw the current economic collapse coming, in fact, we had plenty of warning, depending on who we listened to.Rising Income Inequality in the US: Divisive, Depressing, and Dangerous
The gap between annual incomes of the top 10 per cent of US citizens and what the other 90 per cent gets has been widening sharply for the last 30 years. The nation's economic development has been increasingly divisive. Professor Emmanuel Saez of the University of California at Berkeley, a leading expert, summarizes the facts on his website, from which the graph below is gratefully taken. This graph shows how the top 10 per cent of income earners in the US took home, after the 1970s, an ever more outsized share of the total national income.


